Page 26 - IJES Special Issues for AIEC2016
P. 26
16 © Abu-Zahra and Ateyyat 2016 | Effect of Various Shading Methods
Also, fruit number was increased by increasing
relative humidity.
Figure 2: Effect of shading methods on two- 4. Conclusions
spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae
The results of the present study demonstrate
Populations, on cucumber leaves planted in that the types of the shading treatments used
plastic houses. Means with the same letter are has an effect on plastic cover permeability. After
not significantly different using LSD at 0.955 washing the cover materials, permeability was
reduced by using GS1 or whitewash as shading
C.L. materials. The best results of vegetative growth
and fruit weight were obtained by the GS1
Results of Correlations treatment since it produced the highest vege-
tative growth and improved fruit freshness and
Results of correlations are summarized in Table dry weight. The highest fruit yield was obtained
6 and 7. A positive significant correlation was by the whitewash treatment. Using the GS1 or
observed between light intensity with fruit control treatments was found to maintain fruit
freshness and dry weight, fruit length and most quality. The control treatment delayed flow-
cucumber plant vegetative growth parameters. ering, decreased the production period and
All of these parameters were improved by in- increased the mite infection percentages. On the
creasing light intensity. On the other hand, a other hand, a positive correlation between tem-
positive correlation was observed between perature, fruit freshness and dry weight was
temperature and blooming date. Blooming date observed. The results prove that there is a need
was accelerated by increases in temperature. for shading plastic houses in Jordan Valley
during summer months.
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to the “Scientific Research Sup-
port Fund” for financing this study, farmer
Mohammad Al-Edwan for holding the work, and
special thanks to Agr. Eng. Wafaa Al-Ghnemat
for doing the field and lab work.
References glasshouse tomatoes”, Journal of Horticul-
tural Science, 67: 11-24
Abu-Zahra, T. R. and Ateyyat, M. (2015), “The
Impact of Various Shading Methods on El-Aidy, F., El-Zawely, A., Hassan, N. and El-
Cucumber Growth and Production”, Sawy, M. (2007), “Effect of Plastic Tunnel
International Journal of Tropical Agriculture, Size on Production of Cucumber in Delta of
32 (2): 191-197. (ISSN: 0254-8755) Egypt”, Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 5 (2): 11-24
Bowley, S. R. (1999), A Hitchhiker’s Guide to El-Gizawy, A. M., Abdalla, M. M. F., Gomaa, H. M.
Statistics in Plant Biology. A Division of and Mohammed, S. S. (1992), “Effect of
Plants et al., Inc., Ampersand Printing, 1st Different Shading Level on Tomato Plants
edition, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, NIG Yield and Fruit Quality”, Acta Hort., 323: 349-
2W1. ISBN: 0-9685500-1-0 354
Cockshull, K. E., Graves, C. J. and Cave, C. R. J.
(1992), “The influence of shading on yield of
Science Target Inc. www.sciencetarget.com