Page 77 - IJES Special Issues for AIEC2016
P. 77

International Journal of Environment and Sustainability, 2016, 5(1): 64-70                             67

slight to moderate degree of restriction with      that have high concentrations of suspended
respect to TDS.                                    solids that may cause problems such as clogging
                                                   of the irrigation systems, sealing of the soil
Table 1                                            surface, filling the voids between sand particles,
                                                   reducing soil infiltration, and increasing soil
Quality of the Full-scale Septic Tank Effluents    compaction.
Used as Feed Water

Parameter Add-on System 1 Add-on System 2          Table 2

         Mean     Standard Mean     Standard       Guidelines for Interpretation of Water Quality
                  Deviation         Deviation      for Irrigation (WHO, 2006)

Temperature 21.6  1.8       26.1    4.3            Potential Irrigation Unit    Degree of Restriction
pH 7.7            0.2       7.7     0.1            Problem
EC 835.9          161       789.2   49.9
TSS 14.3          5         11.1    2.2                                         None Slight to Severe
TDS 304.9         38        267.6   13.4                                                   Moderate
                  0.7       44.7    14.8
NO3-N 1.1         15.8      1.7     2              EC μS/m                      <0.7 0.7 - 3.0 >3.0
                  16.3      46.1    15.2           TDS mg/l                     <450 450 - 2000 >2000
NH4-N 56.2        16.8      48.2    14.4           TSS mg/l                     <50 50 - 100 >100
TKN 57.9          1.3       4.9     1
TN 58             12.4      35.8    8              EC at SAR = 0 - 3 dS/m       >0.7 0.7 - 0.2 <0.2
                  4.6       11.7    2.4            EC at SAR = 3 - 6 dS/m       >1.2 1.2 - 0.3 <0.3
PO₄ 5.3           0.4       1.8     0.3            EC at SAR = 6 - 12 dS/m      >1.9 1.9 - 0.5 >0.5
COD 37.8          0.3       0       0
BOD5     14.8     3.00E+07  8.9E+6  2.0E+7         EC at SAR = 12 - 20 dS/m     >2.9 2.9 - 1.3 <1.3
                  2.60E+06  1.1E+6  2.6E+6         EC at SAR = 20 - 40 dS/m     >5.0 5.0 - 2.9 <2.9
DO 1.4            0.05      0       0              Sodium (Na+):         meq/l  <3 3 - 9               >9
O&G 0.1           0.03      0.5     0.2
TC 1.40E+07       0.25      0       0              Sprinkler Irrigation
                  0.3       0.6     0.3            Chloride (Cl−):       meq/l  <3 >3
FC 1.20E+06       0         0       0              Sprinkler Irrigation
C6H5OH 0.1        0.2       0.3     0.2
F0                0.05      0       0              Chloride (Cl−):       meq/l  <4 4 - 10 >10
                  0.2       0       0              Surface Irrigation
H2S 0.3           0.5       0.2     0              Bicarbonate (HCO3) mg/l      <90 90 - 500 >500
Al 0.7            0.2       0       0                                           <0.7 0.7- 3.0 >3.0
As 0              0.1       0.4     0.4            Boron (B)             mg/l   <5 5 - 30 >30
                  0         0       0              Total Nitrogen (TN) mg/l     Normal range: 6.5 - 8.0
B 0.3             0.1       1       0.8            pH -
Cd 0              0.1       0.7     0.5
Cu 0.1            6.8       13      3.5
Fe 0.3                                             Electrical conductivity=EC; total dissolved solids=TDS; total
Pb 0.1                                             suspended solids=TSS; SAR=sodium absorption ratio

Mn 0.1
Hg 0
Ni 0.1                                             3.4 Organic Matter
Zn 0.1
Mg 15                                              Organic contents of wastewater usually increase
                                                   soil moisture, retain metals, and enhance micro-
3.3 Total Suspended Solids                         bial activity. Therefore, irrigation with waste-
                                                   water is generally better than irrigating with
As given in Table 4, the anaerobic-based treated   potable water and then adding synthetic ferti-
system resulted in significantly lower TSS         lizers (Ayers and Westcot, 1985). Table 4 shows
concentrations (mean = 7.4 mg/l) in the final      that both post-treatment systems resulted in a
product water compared to that of the aerobic-     final product that satisfies WHO’s standards. It
based system (mean = 16.4 mg/l). According to      also shows that the anaerobic-based system
the WHO (2006), irrigation with such waters        was more efficient in removing chemical oxygen
does not require any restriction. It is generally  demand (COD) and biological oxygen demand
recommended to avoid irrigation with waters        (BOD5).

                                                   Science Target Inc. www.sciencetarget.com
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82